<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>International Journal for Equity in Health - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by International Journal for Equity in Health</description>
        <dc:date>2009-06-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/23" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/22" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/16" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/15" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/24">
        <title>Access to health care for Roma children in Central and Eastern Europe: findings from a qualitative study in Bulgaria</title>
        <description>Background:
Despite the attention the situation of the Roma in Central and Eastern Europe has received in the context of European Union enlargement, research on their access to health services is very limited, in particular with regard to child health services.
Methods:
50 qualitative in-depth interviews with users, providers and policy-makers concerned with child health services in Bulgaria, conducted in two villages, one town of 70,000 inhabitants, and the capital Sofia.
Results:
Our findings provide important empirical evidence on the range of barriers Roma children face when accessing health services. Among the most important barriers are poverty, administrative and geographical obstacles, low levels of parental education, and lack of ways to accommodate the cultural, linguistic and religious specifics of this population group.
Conclusions:
Our research illustrates the complexity of the problems the Roma face. Access to health care cannot be discussed in isolation from other problems this population group experiences, such as poverty, restricted access to education, and social exclusion.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Boika Rechel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Clare Blackburn</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nick Spencer</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bernd Rechel</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-24</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/23">
        <title>Impact of age at marriage and migration on HIV and AIDS epidemics in Japan</title>
        <description>The causes of wide variation in the rates of HIV and AIDS epidemics among Japanese and non-Japanese nationals are not well understood. So, this paper examines the associations and assesses the potential roles of mean age at marriage, and migration in the HIV and AIDS epidemics in Japan. For the purpose, bivariate and multivariate regression analysis have been performed using epidemiological panel data to build up the relationships among overall HIV and AIDS prevalence, mean age at marriage, and migration. The same analyses have done for non-Japanese nationals living with HIV and AIDS separately. These indicators were significantly correlated with mean age at marriage, and migration. Multivariate linear regression analysis identified non-Japanese nationals&apos; HIV and AIDS prevalence and mean age at marriage as the two most prominent factors linked with the national HIV and AIDS epidemics. The findings of this study supported the hypotheses that a high average age at marriage in the population leads to long period of premarital sex and the non-Japanese nationals&apos; high prevalence facilitating the spread of the HIV and AIDS epidemics in Japan.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/23</link>
                <dc:creator>Nazrul Islam Mondal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hiroshi Takaku Takaku</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yasushi Ohkusa Ohkusa</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:23</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-10T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-23</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-10T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/22">
        <title>Using extended concentration and achievement indices to study socioeconomic inequality in chronic childhood malnutrition: the case of Nigeria</title>
        <description>ObjectivesTo assess and quantify the magnitude of inequalities in under-five child malnutrition, particularly those ascribable to socio-economic status
Methods:
Data on 4187 under-five children were derived from the Nigeria 2003 Demographic and Health Survey. Household asset index was used as the main indicator of socio-economic status. Socio-economic inequality in chronic childhood malnutrition was measured using the &quot;extended&quot; illness concentration and achievement indices.
Results:
There are considerable pro-rich inequalities in the distribution of stunting. South-east and south-west regions had low average levels of childhood malnutrition, but the inequalities between the poor and the better-off were very large. By contrast, North-east and North-west had fairly small gaps between the poor and the better-off on childhood malnutrition, but the average values of the childhood malnutrition was extremely high.
Conclusion:
There are significant differences in under-five child malnutrition that favour the better-off of society as a whole and all geopolitical regions. Like other studies have reported, reliance on global averages alone can be misleading. Thus there is a need for evaluating policies not only in terms of improvements in averages, but also improvements in distribution.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Olalekan Uthman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-22</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/21">
        <title>Inequalities in maternity care and newborn outcomes: one-year surveillance of births in vulnerable slum communities in Mumbai</title>
        <description>Background:
Aggregate urban health statistics mask inequalities. We described maternity care in vulnerable slum communities in Mumbai, and examined differences in care and outcomes between more and less deprived groups.
Methods:
We collected information through a birth surveillance system covering a population of over 280 000 in 48 vulnerable slum localities. Resident women identified births in their own localities and mothers and families were interviewed at 6 weeks after delivery. We analysed data on 5687 births over one year to September 2006. Socioeconomic status was classified using quartiles of standardized asset scores.
Results:
Women in higher socioeconomic quartile groups were less likely to have married and conceived in their teens (Odds ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.69&#8211;0.79, and 0.82, 0.78&#8211;0.87, respectively). There was a socioeconomic gradient away from public sector maternity care with increasing socioeconomic status (0.75, 0.70&#8211;0.79 for antenatal care and 0.66, 0.61&#8211;0.71 for institutional delivery). Women in the least poor group were five times less likely to deliver at home (0.17, 0.10&#8211;0.27) as women in the poorest group and about four times less likely to deliver in the public sector (0.27, 0.21&#8211;0.35). Rising socioeconomic status was associated with a lower prevalence of low birth weight (0.91, 0.85&#8211;0.97). Stillbirth rates did not vary, but neonatal mortality rates fell non-significantly as socioeconomic status increased (0.88, 0.71&#8211;1.08).
Conclusion:
Analyses of this type have usually been applied across the population spectrum from richest to poorest, and we were struck by the regularly stepped picture of inequalities within the urban poor, a group that might inadvertently be considered relatively homogeneous. The poorest slum residents are more dependent upon public sector health care, but the regular progression towards the private sector raises questions about its quality and regulation. It also underlines the need for healthcare provision strategies to take account of both sectors.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Neena Shah More</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ujwala Bapat</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sushmita Das</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Barnett</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anthony Costello</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Armida Fernandez</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Osrin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-06-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-21</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-06-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/20">
        <title>Health financing for the poor produces promising short-term effects on utilization and out-of-pocket expenditure: evidence from Vietnam</title>
        <description>Background:
Vietnam introduced the Health Care Fund for the Poor in 2002 to increase access to health care and reduce the financial burden of health expenditure faced by the poor and ethnic minorities. It is often argued that effects of financing reforms take a long time to materialize. This study evaluates the short-term impact of the program to determine if pro-poor financing programs can achieve immediate effects on health care utilization and out-of-pocket expenditure.MethodConsidering that the program is a non-random policy initiative rolled out nationally, we apply propensity score matching with both single differences and double differences to data from the Vietnam Household Living Standards Surveys 2002 (pre-program data) and 2004 (first post-program data).
Results:
We find a small, positive impact on overall health care utilization. We find evidence of two substitution effects: from private to public providers and from primary to secondary and tertiary level care. Finally, we find a strong negative impact on out-of-pocket health expenditure.
Conclusion:
The results indicate that the Health Care Fund for the Poor is meeting its objectives of increasing utilization and reducing out-of-pocket expenditure for the program&apos;s target population, despite numerous administrative problems resulting in delayed and only partial implementation in most provinces. The main lessons for low and middle-income countries from Vietnam&apos;s early experiences with the Health Care Fund for the Poor are that it managed to achieve positive outcomes in a short time-period, the need to ensure adequate and sustained funding for targeted programs, including marginal administrative costs, develop effective targeting mechanisms and systems for informing beneficiaries and providers about the program, respond to the increased demand for health care generated by the program, address indirect costs of health care utilization, and establish and maintain routine and systematic monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Henrik Axelson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Bales</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pham Duc Minh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Bjorn Ekman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ulf-G Gerdtham</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-20</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/19">
        <title>Reducing disparities in mammography-use in a multicultural population in Israel</title>
        <description>Background:
In the past mammography-use has been reported to be low in Israel compared to other western countries. The objectives of this study were (1) to assess the increase in mammography-use during the years 2002 to 2007 in four population groups in Maccabi Healthcare Services (MHS), Israel: non-immigrant non-ultraorthodox, ultraorthodox, and immigrant Jewish women and Arab women; (2) to assess ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in mammography-use.
Methods:
A random telephone survey of 1,550 women receiving healthcare services from MHS was performed during May-June 2007. Information from MHS claims-records database regarding mammography-use was obtained for each woman for the period 2002 to 2007. Since mammography-use serves as a quality assurance measure for primary care, MHS sent mail and telephone invitations for mammography to all women since the end of 2004.
Results:
At the beginning of the follow-up period (2002) mammography-use among Jewish non-immigrant non-ultraorthodox and ultraorthodox women was higher than among Arab and Jewish immigrant women. During the 5 year follow-up these disparities decreased significantly. In 2007, mammography-use by Arab women was only slightly lower compared to all groups of Jewish women. In 2007, after adjustment for socioeconomic factors there was only a borderline significant difference between Jewish and Arab women. The socioeconomic variables were not associated with mammography-use in 2002 and 2007 in any of the groups except for marital status in immigrant women in 2002.
Conclusion:
The interventions implemented by MHS may have increased mammography-use in all population groups, decreasing disparities between the groups, however the differences between Jewish and Arab women have not been completely eliminated and indicate a need for further targeted interventions. No significant socioeconomic disparities in mammography-use were observed.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Orna Baron-Epel</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nurit Friedman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Omri Lernau</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-19</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/18">
        <title>Promoting LGBT health and wellbeing through inclusive policy development</title>
        <description>In this paper we argue the importance of including gender and sexually diverse populations in policy development towards a more inclusive form of health promotion. We emphasize the need to address the broad health and wellbeing issues and needs of LGBT people, rather than exclusively using an illness-based focus such as HIV/AIDS. We critically examine the limitations of population health, the social determinants of health (SDOH), and public health goals, in light of the lack of recognition of gender and sexually diverse individuals and communities. By first acknowledging the unique health and social care needs of LGBT people, then employing anti-oppressive, critical and intersectional analyses we offer recommendations for how to make population health perspectives, public health goals, and the design of public health promotion policy more inclusive of gender and sexual diversity. In health promotion research and practice, representation matters. It matters which populations are being targeted for health promotion interventions and for what purposes, and it matters which populations are being overlooked. In Canada, current health promotion policy is informed by population health and social determinants of health (SDOH) perspectives, as demonstrated by Public Health Goals for Canada. With Canada&apos;s multicultural makeup comes the challenge of ensuring that diverse populations are equitably and effectively recognized in public health and health promotion policy.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Nick Mule</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lori Ross</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Barry Deeprose</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Beth Jackson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Andrea Daley</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anna Travers</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dick Moore</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-18</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/17">
        <title>School-related mediators in social inequalities in smoking: a comparative cross-sectional study of 20,399 adolescents.</title>
        <description>Background:
The aim of this study was to examine the associations between social inequalities and daily smoking among 13 and 15 year olds, and to determine the role of students&apos; academic achievement and school satisfaction in these associations.
Methods:
HBSC is an international study including adolescents from 32 countries in Europe, Israel, and North America. The present study was based on information from 20,399 adolescents from Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland and the United Kingdom. Data were analysed by regression models.
Results:
The initial analyses showed significant inequality in daily smoking in all countries except for Sweden. When adjusted for the mediating role of academic achievement, estimates were attenuated, but remained significant in three countries.
Conclusion:
The study found social inequality in daily smoking in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland and United Kingdom, as well as inequalities in students&apos; academic achievement and school satisfaction. The analyses also showed that above average academic achievement was associated with lower OR of smoking. Teachers and politicians may find this information useful, and allocate resources to give higher priority to a supportive environment in schools especially for children and adolescents in lower social groups. Subsequently this prioritisation might contribute to reducing smoking in this group.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Christina Schnohr</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Svend Kreiner</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mette Rasmussen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Pernille Due</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Finn Diderichsen</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-17</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/16">
        <title>Social determinants of health and health inequities in Nakuru (Kenya)</title>
        <description>Background:
Dramatic inequalities dominate global health today. The rapid urban growth sustained by Kenya in the last decades has created many difficulties that also led to worsening inequalities in health care. The continuous decline in its Human Development Index since the 1990s highlights the hardship that continues to worsen in the country, against the general trend of Sub-Saharan Africa. This paper examines the health status of residents in a major urban centre in Kenya and reviews the effects of selected social determinants on local health.
Methods:
Through field surveys, focus group discussions and a literature review, this study canvasses past and current initiatives and recommends priority actions.
Results:
Areas identified which unevenly affect the health of the most vulnerable segments of the population were: water supply, sanitation, solid waste management, food environments, housing, the organization of health care services and transportation.
Conclusion:
The use of a participatory method proved to be a useful approach that could benefit other urban centres in their analysis of social determinants of health.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Esther Muchukuri</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francis Grenier</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-16</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/15">
        <title>Reducing user fees for primary health care in Kenya: Policy on paper or policy in practice?</title>
        <description>Background:
Removing user fees in primary health care services is one of the most critical policy issues being considered in Africa. User fees were introduced in many African countries during the 1980s and their impacts are well documented. Concerns regarding the negative impacts of user fees have led to a recent shift in health financing debates in Africa. Kenya is one of the countries that have implemented a user fees reduction policy. Like in many other settings, the new policy was evaluated less that one year after implementation, the period when expected positive impacts are likely to be highest. This early evaluation showed that the policy was widely implemented, that levels of utilization increased and that it was popular among patients. Whether or not the positive impacts of user fees removal policies are sustained has hardly been explored. We conducted this study to document the extent to which primary health care facilities in Kenya continue to adhere to a &apos;new&apos; charging policy 3 years after its implementation.
Methods:
Data were collected in two districts (Kwale and Makueni). Multiple methods of data collection were applied including a cross-sectional survey (n = 184 households Kwale; 141 Makueni), Focus Group Discussions (n = 12) and patient exit interviews (n = 175 Kwale; 184 Makueni).
Results:
Approximately one third of the survey respondents could not correctly state the recommended charges for dispensaries, while half did not know what the official charges for health centres were. Adherence to the policy was poor in both districts, but facilities in Makueni were more likely to adhere than those in Kwale. Only 4 facilities in Kwale adhered to the policy compared to 10 in Makueni. Drug shortage, declining revenue, poor policy design and implementation processes were the main reasons given for poor adherence to the policy.
Conclusion:
We conclude that reducing user fees in primary health care in Kenya is a policy on paper that is yet to be implemented fully. We recommend that caution be taken when deciding on how to reduce or abolish user fees and that all potential consequences are carefully considered.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/8/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Jane Chuma</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Janet Musimbi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vincent Okungu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Catherine Goodman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Catherine Molyneux</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2009, 8:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-05-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>8</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-05-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
