<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>International Journal for Equity in Health - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by International Journal for Equity in Health</description>
        <dc:date>2012-02-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/4/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/10/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/12" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/22" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/4/1/2">
        <title>The burden of non communicable diseases in developing countries</title>
        <description>Background:
By the dawn of the third millennium, non communicable diseases are sweeping the entire globe, with an increasing trend in developing countries where, the transition imposes more constraints to deal with the double burden of infective and non-infective diseases in a poor environment characterised by ill-health systems. By 2020, it is predicted that these diseases will be causing seven out of every 10 deaths in developing countries. Many of the non communicable diseases can be prevented by tackling associated risk factors.
Methods:
Data from national registries and international organisms are collected, compared and analyzed. The focus is made on the growing burden of non communicable diseases in developing countries.
Results:
Among non communicable diseases, special attention is devoted to cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer and chronic pulmonary diseases. Their burden is affecting countries worldwide but with a growing trend in developing countries. Preventive strategies must take into account the growing trend of risk factors correlated to these diseases.
Conclusion:
Non communicable diseases are more and more prevalent in developing countries where they double the burden of infective diseases. If the present trend is maintained, the health systems in low-and middle-income countries will be unable to support the burden of disease. Prominent causes for heart disease, diabetes, cancer and pulmonary diseases can be prevented but urgent (preventive) actions are needed and efficient strategies should deal seriously with risk factors like smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity and western diet.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/4/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Abdesslam Boutayeb</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Saber Boutayeb</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2005, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-01-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-4-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-4-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-01-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/19">
        <title>Nutritional status of children in India: household socio-economic condition as the contextual determinant</title>
        <description>Background:
Despite recent achievement in economic progress in India, the fruit of development has failed to secure a better nutritional status among all children of the country. Growing evidence suggest there exists a socio-economic gradient of childhood malnutrition in India. The present paper is an attempt to measure the extent of socio-economic inequality in chronic childhood malnutrition across major states of India and to realize the role of household socio-economic status (SES) as the contextual determinant of nutritional status of children.
Methods:
Using National Family Health Survey-3 data, an attempt is made to estimate socio-economic inequality in childhood stunting at the state level through Concentration Index (CI). Multi-level models; random-coefficient and random-slope are employed to study the impact of SES on long-term nutritional status among children, keeping in view the hierarchical nature of data.Main findingsAcross the states, a disproportionate burden of stunting is observed among the children from poor SES, more so in urban areas. The state having lower prevalence of chronic childhood malnutrition shows much higher burden among the poor. Though a negative correlation (r = -0.603, p &lt; .001) is established between Net State Domestic Product (NSDP) and CI values for stunting; the development indicator is not always linearly correlated with intra-state inequality in malnutrition prevalence. Results from multi-level models however show children from highest SES quintile posses 50 percent better nutritional status than those from the poorest quintile.
Conclusion:
In spite of the declining trend of chronic childhood malnutrition in India, the concerns remain for its disproportionate burden on the poor. The socio-economic gradient of long-term nutritional status among children needs special focus, more so in the states where chronic malnutrition among children apparently demonstrates a lower prevalence. The paper calls for state specific policies which are designed and implemented on a priority basis, keeping in view the nature of inequality in childhood malnutrition in the country and its differential characteristics across the states.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Barun Kanjilal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Papiya Mazumdar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Moumita Mukherjee</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>M Rahman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2010, null:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-19</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-9-19-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/15">
        <title>Equity in Health Care Financing: The Case of Malaysia</title>
        <description>Background:
Equitable financing is a key objective of health care systems. Its importance is evidenced in policy documents, policy statements, the work of health economists and policy analysts. The conventional categorisations of finance sources for health care are taxation, social health insurance, private health insurance and out-of-pocket payments. There are nonetheless increasing variations in the finance sources used to fund health care. An understanding of the equity implications would help policy makers in achieving equitable financing.ObjectiveThe primary purpose of this paper was to comprehensively assess the equity of health care financing in Malaysia, which represents a new country context for the quantitative techniques used. The paper evaluated each of the five financing sources (direct taxes, indirect taxes, contributions to Employee Provident Fund and Social Security Organization, private insurance and out-of-pocket payments) independently, and subsequently by combined the financing sources to evaluate the whole financing system.
Methods:
Cross-sectional analyses were performed on the Household Expenditure Survey Malaysia 1998/99, using Stata statistical software package. In order to assess inequality, progressivity of each finance sources and the whole financing system was measured by Kakwani&apos;s progressivity index.
Results:
Results showed that Malaysia&apos;s predominantly tax-financed system was slightly progressive with a Kakwani&apos;s progressivity index of 0.186. The net progressive effect was produced by four progressive finance sources (in the decreasing order of direct taxes, private insurance premiums, out-of-pocket payments, contributions to EPF and SOCSO) and a regressive finance source (indirect taxes).
Conclusion:
Malaysia&apos;s two tier health system, of a heavily subsidised public sector and a user charged private sector, has produced a progressive health financing system. The case of Malaysia exemplifies that policy makers can gain an in depth understanding of the equity impact, in order to help shape health financing strategies for the nation.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Chai Ping Yu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Whynes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tracey Sach</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-06-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-7-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-06-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/4">
        <title>Income and economic exclusion: Do they measure the same concept?</title>
        <description>Background In this paper, we create an index of economic exclusion based on validated questionnaires of economic hardship and material deprivation, and examine its association with health in Canada. The main study objective is to determine the extent to which income and this index of economic exclusion index are overlapping measurements of the same concept. Methods: We used the Canadian Household Panel Survey Pilot and performed multilevel analysis using a sample of 1588 individuals aged 25 to 64, nested within 975 households. Results: While economic exclusion is inversely correlated with both individual and household income, these are not perfectly overlapping constructs. Indeed, not only these indicators weakly correlated, but they also point to slightly different sociodemographic groups at risk of low income and economic exclusion. Furthermore, the respective associations with health are of comparable magnitude, but when these income and economic exclusion indicators are included together in the same model, they point to independent and cumulative, not redundant effects. Conclusions: We explicitly distinguish, both conceptually and empirically, between income and economic exclusion, one of the main dimensions of social exclusion. Our results suggest that the economic exclusion index we use measures additional aspects of material deprivation that are not captured by income, such as the effective hardship or level of economic &apos;well-being&apos;.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Emilie Renahy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Beatriz Alvarado Llano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Koh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amelie Quesnel-Vallee</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/9">
        <title>Socioeconomic factors differentiating maternal and child health-seeking behavior in rural Bangladesh: A cross-sectional analysis

</title>
        <description>Background:
There has been an increasing availability and accessibility of modern health services in rural Bangladesh over the past decades. However, previous studies on the socioeconomic differentials in the utilization of these services were based on a limited number of factors, focusing either on preventive or on curative modern health services. These studies failed to collect data from remote rural areas of the different regions to examine the socioeconomic differentials in health-seeking behavior.
Methods:
Data from 3,498 randomly selected currently married women from three strata of households within 128 purposively chosen remote villages in three divisions of Bangladesh were collected in 2006. This study used bivariate and multivariate logistic analyses to examine both curative and preventive health-seeking behaviors in seven areas of maternal and child health care: antenatal care, postnatal care, child delivery care, mother&apos;s receipt of Vitamin A postpartum, newborn baby care, care during recent child fever/cough episodes, and maternal coverageby tetanus toxoid (TT).
Results:
A principal finding was that a household&apos;s relative poverty status, as reflected by wealth quintiles, was a major determinant in health-seeking behavior. Mothers in the highest wealth quintile were significantly more likely to use modern trained providers for antenatal care, birth attendance, post natal care and child health care than those in the poorest quintile (&#967;2, p &lt; 0.01). The differentials were less pronounced for other factors examined, such as education, age, and the relative decision-making power of a woman, in both bivariate and multivariate analyses.
Conclusion:
Within rural areas of Bangladesh, where overall poverty is greater and access to health care more difficult, wealth differentials in utilization remain pronounced. Those programs with high international visibility and dedicated funding (e.g., Immunization and Vitamin A delivery) have higher overall prevalence and a more equitable distribution of beneficiaries than the use of modern trained providers for basic essential health care services. Implications of these findings and recommendations are provided.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Ruhul Amin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nirali Shah</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stan Becker</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2010, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-04-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-9-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-04-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/6">
        <title>The quest for equity in Latin America: a comparative analysis of the health care reforms in Brazil and Colombia</title>
        <description>IntroductionBrazil and Colombia have pursued extensive reforms of their health care systems in the last couple of decades. The purported goals of such reforms were to improve access, increase efficiency and reduce health inequities. Notwithstanding their common goals, each country sought a very different pathway to achieve them. While Brazil attempted to reestablish a greater level of State control through a public national health system, Colombia embraced market competition under an employer-based social insurance scheme. This work thus aims to shed some light onto why they pursued divergent strategies and what that has meant in terms of health outcomes.
Methods:
A critical review of the literature concerning equity frameworks, as well as the health care reforms in Brazil and Colombia was conducted. Then, the shortfall inequality values of crude mortality rate, infant mortality rate, under-five mortality rate, and life expectancy for the period 1960-2005 were calculated for both countries. Subsequently, bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed and controlled for possibly confounding factors.
Results:
When controlling for the underlying historical time trend, both countries appear to have experienced a deceleration of the pace of improvements in the years following the reform, for all the variables analyzed.  In the case of Colombia, some of the previous gains in under-five mortality rate and crude mortality rate were, in fact, reversed.
Conclusions:
Neither reform seems to have had a decisive positive impact on the health outcomes analyzed for the defined time period of this research. This, in turn, may be a consequence of both internal characteristics of the respective reforms and external factors beyond the direct control of health reformers. Among the internal characteristics: underfunding, unbridled decentralization and inequitable access to care seem to have been the main constraints. Conversely, international economic adversities, high levels of rural and urban violence, along with entrenched income inequalities seem to have accounted for the highest burden among external factors.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Roberto Esteves</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/3">
        <title>A multilevel analysis of social capital and self-reported health: evidence from Seoul, South Korea.</title>
        <description>Background:
This study aims to resolve two limitations of previous studies. First, as only a few studies examining social capital have been conducted in non-western countries, it is inconclusive that the concept, which has been developed in Western societies, applies similarly to an Asian context. Second, this study considers social capital at the individual-level, area-level and cross-levels of interaction and examines its associations with health while simultaneously controlling for various confounders at both the individual-level and area-level, whereas previous studies only considered one of the two levels. The purpose of this study is therefore to examine the associations between social capital and health by using multilevel analysis after controlling for various confounders both at the individual and area-levels (i.e., concentrated disadvantage) in non-western countries.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional survey from December 2010 to April 2011 in Seoul, South Korea. The target population included respondents aged 25 years and older who have resided in the same administrative area since 2008. The final sample for this study consisted of 4,730 respondents within all 25 of Seoul&apos;s administrative areas.
Results:
In our final model, individual-level social capital, including network sources (OR=1.23; 95% CI=1.11-1.37) and organizational participation (OR=2.55; 95% CI=2.11-3.08) was positively associated with good/very good health. Interestingly, the individual x area organizational participation cross-level interaction was negatively associated with good/very good health (OR=0.40; 95% CI=0.32-0.50), indicating that in areas with higher organizational participation, individuals with high organizational participation were less likely to report good/very good health when compared to low organizational participation individuals.
Conclusion:
Our study provides evidence that individual-level social capital is associated with self-reported health, even after controlling for both individual and area-level confounders. Although this study did not find significant relationships between area-level organizational participation and self-reported health, this study found the cross-level interaction for social capital. Hence, in areas with lower organizational participation, the probability of reporting good/very good health is higher for individuals with high organizational participation than individuals with low organizational participation. This study, albeit tentatively, suggests that policy makers should focus upon social capital when making policies which aim to enhance one&apos;s health.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Sehee Han</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Heaseung Kim</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hee-Sun Lee</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/10/1/15">
        <title>The hidden inequity in health care</title>
        <description>Inequity is the presence of systematic and potentially remediable differences among population groups defined socially, economically, or geographically. It is not the same as inequality, which is a much broader term, generally used in the human rights field to describe differences among individuals some of which are not remediable (at least with current knowledge). Some languages do not make the distinction between the two terms, which may lead to confusion and a need to clarify exact meaning in different contexts. Some people use the term &quot;unfairness&quot; to define inequity, but unfairness is not measurable and therefore not a useful term for policy or evaluation.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/10/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Barbara Starfield</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2011, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-10-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-10-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-04-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/12">
        <title>What impact do prescription drug charges have on efficiency and equity? Evidence from high-income countries</title>
        <description>As pharmaceutical expenditure continues to rise, third-party payers in most high-income countries have increasingly shifted the burden of payment for prescription drugs to patients. A large body of literature has examined the relationship between prescription charges and outcomes such as expenditure, use, and health, but few reviews explicitly link cost sharing for prescription drugs to efficiency and equity. This article reviews 173 studies from 15 high-income countries and discusses their implications for important issues sometimes ignored in the literature; in particular, the extent to which prescription charges contain health care costs and enhance efficiency without lowering equity of access to care.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/12</link>
                <dc:creator>Marin Gemmill</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarah Thomson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elias Mossialos</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, null:12</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-05-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-12</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-7-12-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-05-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/22">
        <title>Sexual slavery without borders: trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation in India</title>
        <description>Trafficking in women and children is a gross violation of human rights. However, this does not prevent an estimated 800 000 women and children to be trafficked each year across international borders. Eighty per cent of trafficked persons end in forced sex work. India has been identified as one of the Asian countries where trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation has reached alarming levels. While there is a considerable amount of internal trafficking from one state to another or within states, India has also emerged as a international supplier of trafficked women and children to the Gulf States and South East Asia, as well as a destination country for women and girls trafficked for commercial sexual exploitation from Nepal and Bangladesh. Trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation is a highly profitable and low risk business that preys on particularly vulnerable populations. This paper presents an overview of the trafficking of women and girls for sexual exploitation (CSE) in India; identifies the health impacts of CSE; and suggest strategies to respond to trafficking and related issues.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Christine Joffres</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edward Mills</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michel Joffres</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tinku Khanna</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Harleen Walia</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Darrin Grund</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, null:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-09-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-22</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-7-22-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-09-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

