<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>International Journal for Equity in Health - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by International Journal for Equity in Health</description>
        <dc:date>2012-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/4/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/2/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/22" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/10/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/24" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/19">
        <title>Nutritional status of children in India: household socio-economic condition as the contextual determinant</title>
        <description>Background:
Despite recent achievement in economic progress in India, the fruit of development has failed to secure a better nutritional status among all children of the country. Growing evidence suggest there exists a socio-economic gradient of childhood malnutrition in India. The present paper is an attempt to measure the extent of socio-economic inequality in chronic childhood malnutrition across major states of India and to realize the role of household socio-economic status (SES) as the contextual determinant of nutritional status of children.
Methods:
Using National Family Health Survey-3 data, an attempt is made to estimate socio-economic inequality in childhood stunting at the state level through Concentration Index (CI). Multi-level models; random-coefficient and random-slope are employed to study the impact of SES on long-term nutritional status among children, keeping in view the hierarchical nature of data.Main findingsAcross the states, a disproportionate burden of stunting is observed among the children from poor SES, more so in urban areas. The state having lower prevalence of chronic childhood malnutrition shows much higher burden among the poor. Though a negative correlation (r = -0.603, p &lt; .001) is established between Net State Domestic Product (NSDP) and CI values for stunting; the development indicator is not always linearly correlated with intra-state inequality in malnutrition prevalence. Results from multi-level models however show children from highest SES quintile posses 50 percent better nutritional status than those from the poorest quintile.
Conclusion:
In spite of the declining trend of chronic childhood malnutrition in India, the concerns remain for its disproportionate burden on the poor. The socio-economic gradient of long-term nutritional status among children needs special focus, more so in the states where chronic malnutrition among children apparently demonstrates a lower prevalence. The paper calls for state specific policies which are designed and implemented on a priority basis, keeping in view the nature of inequality in childhood malnutrition in the country and its differential characteristics across the states.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Barun Kanjilal</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Papiya Mazumdar</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Moumita Mukherjee</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>M Rahman</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2010, null:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-08-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-19</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-9-19-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-08-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/4/1/2">
        <title>The burden of non communicable diseases in developing countries</title>
        <description>Background:
By the dawn of the third millennium, non communicable diseases are sweeping the entire globe, with an increasing trend in developing countries where, the transition imposes more constraints to deal with the double burden of infective and non-infective diseases in a poor environment characterised by ill-health systems. By 2020, it is predicted that these diseases will be causing seven out of every 10 deaths in developing countries. Many of the non communicable diseases can be prevented by tackling associated risk factors.
Methods:
Data from national registries and international organisms are collected, compared and analyzed. The focus is made on the growing burden of non communicable diseases in developing countries.
Results:
Among non communicable diseases, special attention is devoted to cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer and chronic pulmonary diseases. Their burden is affecting countries worldwide but with a growing trend in developing countries. Preventive strategies must take into account the growing trend of risk factors correlated to these diseases.
Conclusion:
Non communicable diseases are more and more prevalent in developing countries where they double the burden of infective diseases. If the present trend is maintained, the health systems in low-and middle-income countries will be unable to support the burden of disease. Prominent causes for heart disease, diabetes, cancer and pulmonary diseases can be prevented but urgent (preventive) actions are needed and efficient strategies should deal seriously with risk factors like smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity and western diet.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/4/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Abdesslam Boutayeb</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Saber Boutayeb</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2005, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2005-01-14T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-4-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-4-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2005-01-14T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/21">
        <title>If you can&apos;t comply with dialysis, how do you expect me to trust you with transplantation? Australian nephrologists&apos; views on Indigenous Australians&apos; &apos;non-compliance&apos; and their suitability for kidney transplantation</title>
        <description>IntroductionIndigenous Australians suffer markedly higher rates of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) but are less likely than their non-Indigenous counterparts to receive a transplant. This difference is not fully explained by measurable clinical differences. Previous work suggests that Indigenous Australian patients may be regarded by treating specialists as &apos;non-compliers&apos;, which may negatively impact on referral for a transplant. However, this decision-making is not well understood. The objectives of this study were to investigate: whether Indigenous patients are commonly characterised as &apos;non-compliers&apos;; how estimations of patient compliance factor into Australian nephrologists&apos; decision-making about transplant referral; and whether this may pose a particular barrier for Indigenous patients accessing transplants.
Methods:
Nineteen nephrologists, from eight renal units treating the majority of Indigenous Australian renal patients, were interviewed in 2005-06 as part of a larger study. Thematic analysis was undertaken to investigate how compliance factors in specialists&apos; decision-making, and its implications for Indigenous patients&apos; likelihood of obtaining transplants.
Results:
Specialists commonly identified Indigenous patients as both non-compliers and high-risk transplant candidates. Definition and assessment of &apos;compliance&apos; was neither formal nor systematic. There was uncertainty about the value of compliance status in predicting post-transplant outcomes and the issue of organ scarcity permeated participants&apos; responses. Overall, there was marked variation in how specialists weighed perceptions of compliance and risk in their decision-making.
Conclusion:
Reliance on notions of patient &apos;compliance&apos; in decision-making for transplant referral is likely to result in continuing disadvantage for Indigenous Australian ESKD patients. In the absence of robust evidence on predictors of post-transplant outcomes, referral decision-making processes require attention and debate.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Kate Anderson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jeannie Devitt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joan Cunningham</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cilla Preece</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Meg Jardine</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alan Cass</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-21</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-21-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/15">
        <title>Equity in Health Care Financing: The Case of Malaysia</title>
        <description>Background:
Equitable financing is a key objective of health care systems. Its importance is evidenced in policy documents, policy statements, the work of health economists and policy analysts. The conventional categorisations of finance sources for health care are taxation, social health insurance, private health insurance and out-of-pocket payments. There are nonetheless increasing variations in the finance sources used to fund health care. An understanding of the equity implications would help policy makers in achieving equitable financing.ObjectiveThe primary purpose of this paper was to comprehensively assess the equity of health care financing in Malaysia, which represents a new country context for the quantitative techniques used. The paper evaluated each of the five financing sources (direct taxes, indirect taxes, contributions to Employee Provident Fund and Social Security Organization, private insurance and out-of-pocket payments) independently, and subsequently by combined the financing sources to evaluate the whole financing system.
Methods:
Cross-sectional analyses were performed on the Household Expenditure Survey Malaysia 1998/99, using Stata statistical software package. In order to assess inequality, progressivity of each finance sources and the whole financing system was measured by Kakwani&apos;s progressivity index.
Results:
Results showed that Malaysia&apos;s predominantly tax-financed system was slightly progressive with a Kakwani&apos;s progressivity index of 0.186. The net progressive effect was produced by four progressive finance sources (in the decreasing order of direct taxes, private insurance premiums, out-of-pocket payments, contributions to EPF and SOCSO) and a regressive finance source (indirect taxes).
Conclusion:
Malaysia&apos;s two tier health system, of a heavily subsidised public sector and a user charged private sector, has produced a progressive health financing system. The case of Malaysia exemplifies that policy makers can gain an in depth understanding of the equity impact, in order to help shape health financing strategies for the nation.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Chai Ping Yu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>David Whynes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tracey Sach</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-06-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-7-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-06-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/2/1/7">
        <title>Inequities in under-five child malnutrition in South Africa</title>
        <description>ObjectivesTo assess and quantify the magnitude of inequalities in under-five child malnutrition, particularly those ascribable to socio-economic status and to consider the policy implications of these findings.
Methods:
Data on 3765 under-five children were derived from the Living Standards and Development Survey. Household income, proxied by per capita household expenditure, was used as the main indicator of socio-economic status. Socio-economic inequality in malnutrition (stunting, underweight and wasting) was measured using the illness concentration index. The concentration index was calculated for the whole sample, as well as for different population groups, areas of residence (rural, urban and metropolitan) and for each province.
Results:
Stunting was found to be the most prevalent form of malnutrition in South Africa. Consistent with expectation, the rate of stunting is observed to be the highest in the Eastern Cape and the Northern Province &#8211; provinces with the highest concentration of poverty. There are considerable pro-rich inequalities in the distribution of stunting and underweight. However, wasting does not manifest gradients related to socio-economic position. Among White children, no inequities are observed in all three forms of malnutrition. The highest pro-rich inequalities in stunting and underweight are found among Coloured children and metropolitan areas. There is a tendency for high pro-rich concentration indices in those provinces with relatively lower rates of stunting and underweight (Gauteng and the Western Cape).
Conclusion:
There are significant differences in under-five child malnutrition (stunting and underweight) that favour the richest of society. These are unnecessary, avoidable and unjust. It is demonstrated that addressing such socio-economic gradients in ill-health, which perpetuate inequalities in the future adult population requires a sound evidence base. Reliance on global averages alone can be misleading. Thus there is a need for evaluating policies not only in terms of improvements in averages, but also improvements in distribution. Furthermore, addressing problems of stunting and underweight, which are found to be responsive to improvements in household income status, requires initiatives that transcend the medical arena.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/2/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Eyob Zere</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Diane McIntyre</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2003, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2003-09-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-2-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-2-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2003-09-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/22">
        <title>Sexual slavery without borders: trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation in India</title>
        <description>Trafficking in women and children is a gross violation of human rights. However, this does not prevent an estimated 800 000 women and children to be trafficked each year across international borders. Eighty per cent of trafficked persons end in forced sex work. India has been identified as one of the Asian countries where trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation has reached alarming levels. While there is a considerable amount of internal trafficking from one state to another or within states, India has also emerged as a international supplier of trafficked women and children to the Gulf States and South East Asia, as well as a destination country for women and girls trafficked for commercial sexual exploitation from Nepal and Bangladesh. Trafficking for commercial sexual exploitation is a highly profitable and low risk business that preys on particularly vulnerable populations. This paper presents an overview of the trafficking of women and girls for sexual exploitation (CSE) in India; identifies the health impacts of CSE; and suggest strategies to respond to trafficking and related issues.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Christine Joffres</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Edward Mills</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michel Joffres</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tinku Khanna</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Harleen Walia</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Darrin Grund</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, null:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-09-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-22</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-7-22-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-09-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/18">
        <title>Understanding determinants of socioeconomic inequality in mental health in Iran&apos;s capital, Tehran:  a concentration index decomposition approach</title>
        <description>Background:
Mental health is of special importance regarding socioeconomic inequalities in health. On the one hand, mental health status mediates the relationship between economic inequality and health; on the other hand, mental health as an &quot;end state&quot; is affected by social factors and socioeconomic inequality. In spite of this, in examining socioeconomic inequalities in health, mental health has attracted less attention than physical health. As a first attempt in Iran, the objectives of this paper were to measure socioeconomic inequality in mental health, and then to untangle and quantify the contributions of potential determinants of mental health to the measured socioeconomic inequality.
Methods:
In a cross-sectional observational study, mental health data were taken from an Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (Urban HEART) survey, conducted on 22 300 Tehran households in 2007 and covering people aged 15 and above. Principal component analysis was used to measure the economic status of households. As a measure of socioeconomic inequality, a concentration index of mental health was applied and decomposed into its determinants.
Results:
The overall concentration index of mental health in Tehran was -0.0673 (95% CI = -0.070 - -0.057). Decomposition of the concentration index revealed that economic status made the largest contribution (44.7%) to socioeconomic inequality in mental health. Educational status (13.4%), age group (13.1%), district of residence (12.5%) and employment status (6.5%) also proved further important contributors to the inequality.
Conclusions:
Socioeconomic inequalities exist in mental health status in Iran&apos;s capital, Tehran. Since the root of this avoidable inequality is in sectors outside the health system, a holistic mental health policy approach which includes social and economic determinants should be adopted to redress the inequitable distribution of mental health.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Esmaeil Khedmati</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ameneh Forouzan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Reza Majdzadeh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohsen Asadi-Lari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ahmad Noorbala</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ahmad Hosseinpoor</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-18</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-18-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/4">
        <title>Priority setting in health care:
Lessons from the experiences of eight countries

</title>
        <description>All health care systems face problems of justice and efficiency related to setting priorities for allocating a limited pool of resources to a population. Because many of the central issues are the same in all systems, the United States and other countries can learn from the successes and failures of countries that have explicitly addressed the question of health care priorities.We review explicit priority setting efforts in Norway, Sweden, Israel, the Netherlands, Denmark, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the state of Oregon in the US. The approaches used can be divided into those centered on outlining principles versus those that define practices. In order to establish the main lessons from their experiences we consider (1) the process each country used, (2) criteria to judge the success of these efforts, (3) which approaches seem to have met these criteria, and (4) using their successes and failures as a guide, how to proceed in setting priorities. We demonstrate that there is little evidence that establishment of a values framework for priority setting has had any effect on health policy, nor is there evidence that priority setting exercises have led to the envisaged ideal of an open and participatory public involvement in decision making.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Lindsay Sabik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Reidar Lie</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-01-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-7-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-01-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/10/1/15">
        <title>The hidden inequity in health care</title>
        <description>Inequity is the presence of systematic and potentially remediable differences among population groups defined socially, economically, or geographically. It is not the same as inequality, which is a much broader term, generally used in the human rights field to describe differences among individuals some of which are not remediable (at least with current knowledge). Some languages do not make the distinction between the two terms, which may lead to confusion and a need to clarify exact meaning in different contexts. Some people use the term &quot;unfairness&quot; to define inequity, but unfairness is not measurable and therefore not a useful term for policy or evaluation.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/10/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Barbara Starfield</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2011, null:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-04-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-10-15</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-10-15-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-04-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/24">
        <title>What is known about the effects of medical tourism in destination and departure countries?  A scoping review</title>
        <description>Background:
Medical tourism involves patients intentionally leaving their home country to access non-emergency health care services abroad. Growth in the popularity of this practice has resulted in a significant amount of attention being given to it from researchers, policy-makers, and the media. Yet, there has been little effort to systematically synthesize what is known about the effects of this phenomenon. This article presents the findings of a scoping review examining what is known about the effects of medical tourism in destination and departure countries.
Methods:
Drawing on academic articles, grey literature, and media sources extracted from18 databases, we follow a widely used scoping review protocol to synthesize what is known about the effects of medical tourism in destination and departure countries. The review design has three main stages: (1) identifying the question and relevant literature; (2) selecting the literature; and (3) charting, collating, and summarizing the data.
Results:
The large majority of the 203 sources accepted into the review offer a perspective of medical tourism from the Global North, focusing on the flow of patients from high income nations to lower and middle income countries. This greatly shapes any discussion of the effects of medical tourism on destination and departure countries. Five interrelated themes that characterize existing discussion of the effects of this practice were extracted from the reviewed sources. These themes frame medical tourism as a: (1) user of public resources; (2) solution to health system problems; (3) revenue generating industry; (4) standard of care; and (5) source of inequity. It is observed that what is currently known about the effects of medical tourism is minimal, unreliable, geographically restricted and mostly based on speculation.
Conclusions:
Given its positive and negative effects on the health care systems of departure and destination countries, medical tourism is a highly significant and contested phenomenon. This is especially true given its potential to serve as a powerful force for the inequitable delivery of health care services globally. It is recommended that empirical evidence and other data associated with medical tourism be subjected to clear and coherent definitions, including reports focused on the flows of medical tourists and surgery success rates. Additional primary research on the effects of medical tourism is needed if the industry is to develop in a manner that is beneficial to citizens of both departure and destination countries.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/9/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Rory Johnston</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Valorie Crooks</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jeremy Snyder</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Paul Kingsbury</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2010, null:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-11-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-24</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-9-24-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-11-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

