<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>International Journal for Equity in Health - Most viewed articles</title>
		<link>http://www.equityhealthj.commostviewed/</link>
		<description>Most viewed articles in last 30 days from International Journal for Equity in Health (ISSN 1475-9276) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
         <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/20"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/15"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/4/1/2"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/21"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/4"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/1/1/1"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/11"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/8"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/12"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/19"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/20">
            
            <title>13,915 reasons for equity in sexual offences legislation: A national school-based survey in South Africa</title>
			<description>ObjectivePrior to 2007, forced sex with male children in South Africa did not count as rape but as "indecent assault", a much less serious offence. This study sought to document prevalence of male sexual violence among school-going youth.DesignA facilitated self-administered questionnaire in nine of the 11 official languages in a stratified (province/metro/urban/rural) last stage random national sample.SettingTeams visited 5162 classes in 1191 schools, in October and November 2002.ParticipantsA total of 269,705 learners aged 10&#8211;19 years in grades 6&#8211;11. Of these, 126,696 were male.Main outcome measuresSchoolchildren answered questions about exposure in the last year to insults, beating, unwanted touching and forced sex. They indicated the sex of the perpetrator, and whether this was a family member, a fellow schoolchild, a teacher or another adult. Respondents also gave the age when they first suffered forced sex and when they first had consensual sex.
Results:
Some 9% (weighted value based on 13915/127097) of male respondents aged 11&#8211;19 years reported forced sex in the last year. Of those aged 18 years at the time of the survey, 44% (weighted value of 5385/11450) said they had been forced to have sex in their lives and 50% reported consensual sex. Perpetrators were most frequently an adult not from their own family, followed closely in frequency by other schoolchildren. Some 32% said the perpetrator was male, 41% said she was female and 27% said they had been forced to have sex by both male and female perpetrators. Male abuse of schoolboys was more common in rural areas while female perpetration was more an urban phenomenon.
Conclusion:
This study uncovers endemic sexual abuse of male children that was suspected but hitherto only poorly documented. Legal recognition of the criminality of rape of male children is a first step. The next steps include serious investment in supporting male victims of abuse, and in prevention of all childhood sexual abuse.</description>
			<link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/20</link>		
			<dc:creator>Neil Andersson and Ari Ho-Foster</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, 7:20</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 579</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-29</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-20</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-29</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/15">
            
            <title>Equity in health care financing: The case of Malaysia</title>
			<description>Background:
Equitable financing is a key objective of health care systems. Its importance is evidenced in policy documents, policy statements, the work of health economists and policy analysts. The conventional categorisations of finance sources for health care are taxation, social health insurance, private health insurance and out-of-pocket payments. There are nonetheless increasing variations in the finance sources used to fund health care. An understanding of the equity implications would help policy makers in achieving equitable financing.ObjectiveThe primary purpose of this paper was to comprehensively assess the equity of health care financing in Malaysia, which represents a new country context for the quantitative techniques used. The paper evaluated each of the five financing sources (direct taxes, indirect taxes, contributions to Employee Provident Fund and Social Security Organization, private insurance and out-of-pocket payments) independently, and subsequently by combined the financing sources to evaluate the whole financing system.
Methods:
Cross-sectional analyses were performed on the Household Expenditure Survey Malaysia 1998/99, using Stata statistical software package. In order to assess inequality, progressivity of each finance sources and the whole financing system was measured by Kakwani's progressivity index.
Results:
Results showed that Malaysia's predominantly tax-financed system was slightly progressive with a Kakwani's progressivity index of 0.186. The net progressive effect was produced by four progressive finance sources (in the decreasing order of direct taxes, private insurance premiums, out-of-pocket payments, contributions to EPF and SOCSO) and a regressive finance source (indirect taxes).
Conclusion:
Malaysia's two tier health system, of a heavily subsidised public sector and a user charged private sector, has produced a progressive health financing system. The case of Malaysia exemplifies that policy makers can gain an in depth understanding of the equity impact, in order to help shape health financing strategies for the nation.</description>
			<link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/15</link>		
			<dc:creator>Chai Ping Yu, David K Whynes and Tracey H Sach</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, 7:15</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 310</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-06-09</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-15</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-06-09</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/4/1/2">
            
            <title>The burden of non communicable diseases in developing countries</title>
			<description>Background:
By the dawn of the third millennium, non communicable diseases are sweeping the entire globe, with an increasing trend in developing countries where, the transition imposes more constraints to deal with the double burden of infective and non-infective diseases in a poor environment characterised by ill-health systems. By 2020, it is predicted that these diseases will be causing seven out of every 10 deaths in developing countries. Many of the non communicable diseases can be prevented by tackling associated risk factors.
Methods:
Data from national registries and international organisms are collected, compared and analyzed. The focus is made on the growing burden of non communicable diseases in developing countries.
Results:
Among non communicable diseases, special attention is devoted to cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, cancer and chronic pulmonary diseases. Their burden is affecting countries worldwide but with a growing trend in developing countries. Preventive strategies must take into account the growing trend of risk factors correlated to these diseases.
Conclusion:
Non communicable diseases are more and more prevalent in developing countries where they double the burden of infective diseases. If the present trend is maintained, the health systems in low-and middle-income countries will be unable to support the burden of disease. Prominent causes for heart disease, diabetes, cancer and pulmonary diseases can be prevented but urgent (preventive) actions are needed and efficient strategies should deal seriously with risk factors like smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity and western diet.</description>
			<link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/4/1/2</link>		
			<dc:creator>Abdesslam Boutayeb and Saber Boutayeb</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2005, 4:2</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 269</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2005-01-14</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-4-2</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2005-01-14</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/21">
            
            <title>Is it possible to identify patient's sex when reading blinded illness narratives? An experimental study about gender bias</title>
			<description>Background:
In many diseases men and women, for no apparent medical reason, are not offered the same investigations and treatment in health care. This may be due to staff's stereotypical preconceptions about men and women, i.e., gender bias. In the clinical situation it is difficult to know whether gender differences in management reflect physicians' gender bias or male and female patients' different needs or different ways of expressing their needs. To shed some light on these possibilities this study investigated to what extent it was possible to identify patients' sex when reading their blinded illness narratives, i.e., do male and female patients express themselves differently enough to be recognised as men and women without being categorised on beforehand?
Methods:
Eighty-one authentic letters about being diseased by cancer were blinded regarding sex and read by 130 students of medicine and psychology. For each letter the participants were asked to give the author's sex and to explain their choice. The success rates were analysed statistically. To illuminate the participants' reasoning the explanations of four letters were analysed qualitatively.
Results:
The patient's sex was correctly identified in 62% of the cases, with significantly higher rates in male narratives. There were no differences between male and female participants. In the qualitative analysis the choice of a male writer was explained by: a short letter; formal language; a focus on facts and a lack of emotions. In contrast the reasons for the choice of a woman were: a long letter; vivid language; mention of emotions and interpersonal relationships. Furthermore, the same expressions were interpreted differently depending on whether the participant believed the writer to be male or female.
Conclusion:
It was possible to detect gender differences in the blinded illness narratives. The students' explanations for their choice of sex agreed with common gender stereotypes implying that such stereotypes correspond, at least on a group level, to differences in male and female patients' illness descriptions. However, it was also obvious that preconceptions about gender obstructed and biased the interpretations, a finding with implications for the understanding of gender bias in clinical practice.</description>
			<link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/21</link>		
			<dc:creator>Jenny Andersson, P&#228;r Salander, Marie Brandstetter-Hiltunen, Emma Knutsson and Katarina Hamberg</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, 7:21</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 260</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-08-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-21</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/4">
            
            <title>Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries</title>
			<description>All health care systems face problems of justice and efficiency related to setting priorities for allocating a limited pool of resources to a population. Because many of the central issues are the same in all systems, the United States and other countries can learn from the successes and failures of countries that have explicitly addressed the question of health care priorities.We review explicit priority setting efforts in Norway, Sweden, Israel, the Netherlands, Denmark, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the state of Oregon in the US. The approaches used can be divided into those centered on outlining principles versus those that define practices. In order to establish the main lessons from their experiences we consider (1) the process each country used, (2) criteria to judge the success of these efforts, (3) which approaches seem to have met these criteria, and (4) using their successes and failures as a guide, how to proceed in setting priorities. We demonstrate that there is little evidence that establishment of a values framework for priority setting has had any effect on health policy, nor is there evidence that priority setting exercises have led to the envisaged ideal of an open and participatory public involvement in decision making.</description>
			<link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/4</link>		
			<dc:creator>Lindsay M Sabik and Reidar K Lie</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, 7:4</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 248</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-01-21</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-4</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-21</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/1/1/1">
            
            <title>Annotated Bibliography on Equity in Health, 1980-2001</title>
			<description>The purposes of this bibliography are to present an overview of the published literature on equity in health and to summarize key articles relevant to the mission of the International Society for Equity in Health (ISEqH). The intent is to show the directions being taken in health equity research including theories, methods, and interventions to understand the genesis of inequities and their remediation. Therefore, the bibliography includes articles from the health equity literature that focus on mechanisms by which inequities in health arise and approaches to reducing them where and when they exist.</description>
			<link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/1/1/1</link>		
			<dc:creator>James A Macinko and Barbara Starfield</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2002, 1:1</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 212</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2002-04-22</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-1-1</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2002-04-22</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/11">
            
            <title>Poverty and maternal mortality in Nigeria: towards a more viable ethics of modern medical practice</title>
			<description>Poverty is often identified as a major barrier to human development. It is also a powerful brake on accelerated progress toward the Millennium Development Goals. Poverty is also a major cause of maternal mortality, as it prevents many women from getting proper and adequate medical attention due to their inability to afford good antenatal care. This Paper thus examines poverty as a threat to human existence, particularly women's health. It highlights the causes of maternal deaths in Nigeria by questioning the practice of medicine in this country, which falls short of the ethical principle of showing care.Since high levels of poverty limit access to quality health care and consequently human development, this paper suggests ways of reducing maternal mortality in Nigeria. It emphasizes the importance of care ethics, an ethical orientation that seeks to rectify the deficiencies of medical practice in Nigeria, notably the problem of poor reproductive health services.Care ethics as an ethical orientation, attends to the important aspects of our shared lives. It portrays the moral agent (in this context the physician) as a self who is embedded in webs of relations with others (pregnant women). Also central to this ethical orientation is responsiveness in an interconnected network of needs, care and prevention of harm.This review concludes by stressing that many human relationships involve persons who are vulnerable, including pregnant women, dependent, ill and or frail, noting that the desirable moral response is that prescribed by care ethics, which thus has implications for the practice of medicine in Nigeria.</description>
			<link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/11</link>		
			<dc:creator>Bolatito A Lanre-Abass</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, 7:11</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 208</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-04-30</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-11</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>11</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-30</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/8">
            
            <title>HIV/AIDS and home-based health care</title>
			<description>This paper highlights the socio-economic impacts of HIV/AIDS on women. It argues that the socio-cultural beliefs that value the male and female lives differently lead to differential access to health care services. The position of women is exacerbated by their low financial base especially in the rural community where their main source of livelihood, agricultural production does not pay much. But even their active involvement in agricultural production or any other income ventures is hindered when they have to give care to the sick and bedridden friends and relatives. This in itself is a threat to household food security. The paper proposes that gender sensitive policies and programming of intervention at community level would lessen the burden on women who bear the brunt of AIDS as caregivers and livelihood generators at household level. Improvement of medical facilities and quality of services at local dispensaries is seen as feasible since they are in the rural areas. Other interventions should target freeing women's and girls' time for education and involvement in income generating ventures. Two separate data sets from Western Kenya, one being quantitative and another qualitative data have been used.</description>
			<link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/8</link>		
			<dc:creator>Pamella A Opiyo, Takashi Yamano and TS Jayne</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, 7:8</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 208</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-03-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-8</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-03-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/12">
            
            <title>What impact do prescription drug charges have on efficiency and equity? Evidence from high-income countries</title>
			<description>As pharmaceutical expenditure continues to rise, third-party payers in most high-income countries have increasingly shifted the burden of payment for prescription drugs to patients. A large body of literature has examined the relationship between prescription charges and outcomes such as expenditure, use, and health, but few reviews explicitly link cost sharing for prescription drugs to efficiency and equity. This article reviews 173 studies from 15 high-income countries and discusses their implications for important issues sometimes ignored in the literature; in particular, the extent to which prescription charges contain health care costs and enhance efficiency without lowering equity of access to care.</description>
			<link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/12</link>		
			<dc:creator>Marin C Gemmill, Sarah Thomson and Elias Mossialos</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, 7:12</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 206</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-05-02</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-12</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>12</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-05-02</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/19">
            
            <title>Determinants of self rated health and mortality in Russia &#8211; are they the same?</title>
			<description>Background:
Research into Russia's health crisis during the 1990s includes studies of both mortality and self-rated health, assuming that the determinants of the two are the same. In this paper, we tested this assumption, using data from a single study on both outcomes and socioeconomic, lifestyle and psychological predictor variables.
Methods:
We analysed data from 7 rounds (1994&#8211;2001) of the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey, a panel study of a general population sample (11,482 adults aged over 18 living in households of 2 or more people). Self-rated health was measured on a 5 point scale and dichotomised by combining responses "very poor" and "poor" into poor health. Deaths (n = 782) during a mean follow up of 4.1 years were reported by another household member. Associations between several predictor variables and poor or very poor self-rated health and mortality were measured using logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards analysis respectively.
Results:
Poor self-rated health was significantly associated with mortality; hazard ratios, compared with very good, good or average health, were 1.69 (1.36-2.10) in men and 1.74 (1.38-2.20) in women. Low education predicted both mortality and poor self-rated health, but income predicted subjective health more strongly. Smoking doubled the risk of death but was unrelated to subjective wellbeing. Frequent drinkers experienced greater mortality than occasional drinkers, despite reporting better health. In contrast, dissatisfaction with life predicted poor self-rated health, but not mortality.
Conclusion:
Differences between the predictors of subjective health and mortality, even though these outcomes were strongly associated, suggest that influences on subjective health are not restricted to serious disease. These findings also suggest the  presence of risk factors for relatively sudden deaths in apparently well people, although further research is required. Meanwhile, caution is required when using studies of self-rated health in Russia to understand the determinants of mortality.</description>
			<link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/7/1/19</link>		
			<dc:creator>Francesca Perlman and Martin Bobak</dc:creator>
			<dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2008, 7:19</dc:source>
			<dc:subject>Number of accesses: 167</dc:subject>
			<dc:date>2008-07-25</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-19</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>7</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-07-25</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
	<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
