<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>International Journal for Equity in Health - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by International Journal for Equity in Health</description>
        <dc:date>2012-05-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/25" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/23" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/22" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/21" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/20" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/19" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/18" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/16" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/25">
        <title>Cultural repertoires and food-related household technology within Colonia households under conditions of material hardship</title>
        <description>IntroductionMexican-origin women in the U.S. living in colonias (new-destination Mexican-immigrant communities) along the Texas-Mexico border suffer from a high incidence of food insecurity and diet-related chronic disease. Understanding environmental factors that influence food-related behaviors among this population will be important to improving the well-being of colonia households. This article focuses on cultural repertoires that enable food choice and the everyday uses of technology in food-related practice by Mexican-immigrant women in colonia households under conditions of material hardship. Findings are presented within a conceptual framework informed by concepts drawn from sociological accounts of technology, food choice, culture, and material hardship.
Methods:
Field notes were provided by teams of promotora-researchers (indigenous community health workers) and public-health professionals trained as participant observers. They conducted observations on three separate occasions (two half-days during the week and one weekend day) within eight family residences located in colonias near the towns of Alton and San Carlos, Texas. English observations were coded inductively and early observations stressed the importance of technology and material hardship in food-related behavior. These observations were further explored and coded using the qualitative data package Atlas.ti.
Results:
Technology included kitchen implements used in standard and adapted configurations and household infrastructure. Residents employed tools across a range of food-related activities identified as forms of food acquisition, storage, preparation, serving, feeding and eating, cleaning, and waste processing. Material hardships included the quality, quantity, acceptability, and uncertainty dimensions of food insecurity, and insufficient consumption of housing, clothing and medical care. Cultural repertoires for coping with material hardship included reliance on inexpensive staple foods and dishes, and conventional and innovative technological practices. These repertoires expressed the creative agency of women colonia residents. Food-related practices were constrained by climate, animal and insect pests, women&apos;s gender roles, limitations in neighborhood and household infrastructure, and economic and material resources.
Conclusions:
This research points to the importance of socioeconomic and structural factors such as gender roles, economic poverty and material hardship as constraints on food choice and food-related behavior. In turn, it emphasizes the innovative practices employed by women residents of colonias to prepare meals under these constraints.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/25</link>
                <dc:creator>Wesley Dean</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph Sharkey</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cassandra Johnson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Julie St. John</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:25</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-25</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-25-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>25</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/24">
        <title>Inequity in maternal health care utilization in
Vietnam</title>
        <description>IntroductionVietnam has succeeded in reducing maternal mortality in the last decades. Analysis of survey data however indicate that large inequities exist between different segments of the population. We have analyzed utilization of antenatal care and skilled birth attendance among Vietnamese women of reproductive age in relation to social determinants with the aim to reveal health inequities and identify disadvantaged groups.MethodData on maternal health care utilization and social determinants were derived from the Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) conducted in Vietnam in 2006, and analyzed through stratified logistic regressions and g-computation.
Results:
Inequities in maternal health care utilization persist in Vietnam. Ethnicity, household wealth and education were all significantly associated with antenatal care coverage and skilled birth attendance, individually and in synergy. Although the structural determinants included in this study were closely related to each other, analysis revealed a significant effect of ethnicity over and above wealth and education. Within the group of mothers from poor households ethnic minority mothers were at a three-fold risk of not attending any antenatal care (OR 3.06, 95 % CI 1.27-7.41)  and  six times more likely not to deliver with skilled birth attendance (OR 6.27, 95 % CI 2.37-16.6). The association between ethnicity and lack of antenatal care and skilled birth attendance was even stronger within the non-poor group.
Conclusions:
In spite of policies to out rule health inequities, ethnic minority women constitute a disadvantaged group in Vietnam. More efficient ways to target disadvantaged groups, taking synergy effects between multiple social determinants into consideration, are needed in order to assure safe motherhood for all.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>Emilia Goland</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dinh Hoa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mats Målqvist</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-24</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-24-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/23">
        <title>Informal politics and inequity of access to health care in Lebanon</title>
        <description>IntroductionDespite the importance of political institutions in shaping the social environment, the causal impact of politics on health care access and inequalities has been understudied. Even when considered, research tends to focus on the effects of formal macro-political institutions such as the welfare state. We investigate how micro-politics and informal institutions affect access to care.
Methods:
This study uses a mixed-methods approach, combining findings from a household survey (n = 1789) and qualitative interviews (n = 310) in Lebanon. Multivariate logistic regression was employed in the analysis of the survey to examine the effect of political activism on access to health care while controlling for age, sex, socioeconomic status, religious commitment and piety.
Results:
We note a significantly positive association between political activism and the probability of receiving health aid (p &lt; .001), with an OR of 4.0 when comparing individuals with the highest political activity to those least active in our sample. Interviews with key informants also reveal that, although a form of &quot;universal coverage&quot; exists in Lebanon whereby any citizen is eligible for coverage of hospitalization fees and treatments, in practice, access to health services is used by political parties and politicians as a deliberate strategy to gain and reward political support from individuals and their families.
Conclusions:
Individuals with higher political activism have better access to health services than others. Informal, micro-level political institutions can have an important impact on health care access and utilization, with potentially detrimental effects on the least politically connected. A truly universal health care system that provides access based on medical need rather than political affiliation is needed to help to alleviate growing health disparities in the Lebanese population.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/23</link>
                <dc:creator>Bradley Chen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Melani Cammett</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:23</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-05-09T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-23</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-23-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>23</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-05-09T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/22">
        <title>Persistent disparities in cholesterol screening among immigrants to the United States</title>
        <description>Background:
This study compared differences in cholesterol screening among immigrant populations and US born race/ethnic groups and whether improving access to health care reduced differences in screening.
Methods:
Self-reported cholesterol screening for adults was calculated from multivariate logistic regression analysis of the 1988-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (N = 17,118). Immigrant populations were classified by place of birth and length of residency.
Results:
After adjusting for individual characteristics and access to health care, the multivariate adjusted probability of cholesterol screening is significantly lower for persons originating from Mexico (70.9%) compared to persons born in the US (80.1%) or compared to US born Hispanic persons (77.8%). Adjustment for access to care did significantly reduce the difference in screening rates between immigrants and natives because the rate for natives remained the same, but the rate for immigrants improved. For example, the difference in screening between US born persons and persons born in Mexico was reduced by nearly 10% after adjustment for access to care.
Conclusions:
There are persistent disparities in cholesterol screening for immigrants, particularly recent immigrants from Mexico, but improved access to health care may be a viable policy intervention to reduce disparities.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/22</link>
                <dc:creator>Jim Stimpson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fernando Wilson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Rosenda Murillo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jose Pagan</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:22</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-22</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-22-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>22</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/21">
        <title>If you can&apos;t comply with dialysis, how do you expect me to trust you with transplantation? Australian nephrologists&apos; views on Indigenous Australians&apos; &apos;non-compliance&apos; and their suitability for kidney transplantation</title>
        <description>IntroductionIndigenous Australians suffer markedly higher rates of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) but are less likely than their non-Indigenous counterparts to receive a transplant. This difference is not fully explained by measurable clinical differences. Previous work suggests that Indigenous Australian patients may be regarded by treating specialists as &apos;non-compliers&apos;, which may negatively impact on referral for a transplant. However, this decision-making is not well understood. The objectives of this study were to investigate: whether Indigenous patients are commonly characterised as &apos;non-compliers&apos;; how estimations of patient compliance factor into Australian nephrologists&apos; decision-making about transplant referral; and whether this may pose a particular barrier for Indigenous patients accessing transplants.
Methods:
Nineteen nephrologists, from eight renal units treating the majority of Indigenous Australian renal patients, were interviewed in 2005-06 as part of a larger study. Thematic analysis was undertaken to investigate how compliance factors in specialists&apos; decision-making, and its implications for Indigenous patients&apos; likelihood of obtaining transplants.
Results:
Specialists commonly identified Indigenous patients as both non-compliers and high-risk transplant candidates. Definition and assessment of &apos;compliance&apos; was neither formal nor systematic. There was uncertainty about the value of compliance status in predicting post-transplant outcomes and the issue of organ scarcity permeated participants&apos; responses. Overall, there was marked variation in how specialists weighed perceptions of compliance and risk in their decision-making.
Conclusion:
Reliance on notions of patient &apos;compliance&apos; in decision-making for transplant referral is likely to result in continuing disadvantage for Indigenous Australian ESKD patients. In the absence of robust evidence on predictors of post-transplant outcomes, referral decision-making processes require attention and debate.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/21</link>
                <dc:creator>Kate Anderson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jeannie Devitt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joan Cunningham</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Cilla Preece</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Meg Jardine</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alan Cass</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:21</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-21</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-21-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>21</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/20">
        <title>Comprehensive determinants of health service utilisation for mental health reasons in a canadian catchment area</title>
        <description>IntroductionThis study sought to identify factors associated with health service utilisation by individuals with mental disorders in a Canadian catchment area.
Methods:
To be included in the study, participants had to be aged between 15 and 65 and reside in the study location. Data was collected randomly from June to December 2009 by specially trained interviewers. A comprehensive set of variables (including geospatial factors) was studied using the Andersen&apos;s behavioural health service model. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariate analyses were carried out.
Results:
Among 406 individuals diagnosed with mental disorders, 212 reported using a mental health service at least once in the 12 months preceding the interviews. Emotional problems and a history of violence victimisation were most strongly associated with such utilisation. Participants who were middle-aged or deemed their mental health to be poor were also more likely to seek mental healthcare. Individuals living in neighbourhoods where rental accommodations were the norm used significantly fewer health services than individuals residing in neighbourhoods where homeownership was preponderant; males were also less likely to use services than females.
Conclusions:
Our study broke new ground by uncovering the impact of longstanding violence victimisation, and the proportion of homeownership on mental health service utilisation among this population. It also confirmed the prominence of some variables (gender, age, emotional problems and self-perceived mental health) as key enabling variables of health-seeking. There should be better promotion of strategies designed to change the attitudes of males and youths and to deal with violence victimisation. There is also as need for initiatives that are targeted to neighbourhoods where there is more rental housing.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Marie-Josee Fleury</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Guy Grenier</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean-Marie Bamvita</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michel Perreault</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Yan Kestens</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean Caron</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-20</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-20-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-02T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/19">
        <title>Could gender equality in parental leave harm off-springs&apos; mental health? A registry study of the Swedish parental/child cohort of 1988/89</title>
        <description>IntroductionMental ill-health among children and young adults is a growing public health problem and research into causes involves consideration of family life and gender practice. This study aimed at exploring the association between parents&apos; degree of gender equality in childcare and children&apos;s mental ill-health.
Methods:
The population consisted of Swedish parents and their firstborn child in 1988-1989 (N = 118 595 family units) and the statistical method was multiple logistic regression. Gender equality of childcare was indicated by the division of parental leave (1988-1990), and child mental ill-health was indicated by outpatient mental care (2001-2006) and drug prescription (2005-2008), for anxiety and depression.
Results:
The overall finding was that boys with gender traditional parents (mother dominance in childcare) have lower risk of depression measured by outpatient mental care than boys with gender-equal parents, while girls with gender traditional and gender untraditional parents (father dominance in childcare) have lower risk of anxiety measured by drug prescription than girls with gender-equal parents.
Conclusions:
This study suggests that unequal parenting regarding early childcare, whether traditional or untraditional, is more beneficial for offspring&apos;s mental health than equal parenting. However, further research is required to confirm our findings and to explore the pathways through which increased gender equality may influence child health.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/19</link>
                <dc:creator>Lisa Norstrom</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lene Lindberg</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anna Mansdotter</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:19</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-19</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-19-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/18">
        <title>Understanding determinants of socioeconomic inequality in mental health in Iran&apos;s capital, Tehran:  a concentration index decomposition approach</title>
        <description>Background:
Mental health is of special importance regarding socioeconomic inequalities in health. On the one hand, mental health status mediates the relationship between economic inequality and health; on the other hand, mental health as an &quot;end state&quot; is affected by social factors and socioeconomic inequality. In spite of this, in examining socioeconomic inequalities in health, mental health has attracted less attention than physical health. As a first attempt in Iran, the objectives of this paper were to measure socioeconomic inequality in mental health, and then to untangle and quantify the contributions of potential determinants of mental health to the measured socioeconomic inequality.
Methods:
In a cross-sectional observational study, mental health data were taken from an Urban Health Equity Assessment and Response Tool (Urban HEART) survey, conducted on 22 300 Tehran households in 2007 and covering people aged 15 and above. Principal component analysis was used to measure the economic status of households. As a measure of socioeconomic inequality, a concentration index of mental health was applied and decomposed into its determinants.
Results:
The overall concentration index of mental health in Tehran was -0.0673 (95% CI = -0.070 - -0.057). Decomposition of the concentration index revealed that economic status made the largest contribution (44.7%) to socioeconomic inequality in mental health. Educational status (13.4%), age group (13.1%), district of residence (12.5%) and employment status (6.5%) also proved further important contributors to the inequality.
Conclusions:
Socioeconomic inequalities exist in mental health status in Iran&apos;s capital, Tehran. Since the root of this avoidable inequality is in sectors outside the health system, a holistic mental health policy approach which includes social and economic determinants should be adopted to redress the inequitable distribution of mental health.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/18</link>
                <dc:creator>Esmaeil Khedmati</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ameneh Forouzan</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Reza Majdzadeh</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mohsen Asadi-Lari</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ahmad Noorbala</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ahmad Hosseinpoor</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:18</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-18</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-18-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/17">
        <title>Addressing poverty through disease control programmes: examples from Tuberculosis control in India</title>
        <description>IntroductionTuberculosis remains a major public health problem in India with the country accounting for one-fifth or 21% of all tuberculosis cases reported globally. The purpose of the study was to obtain an understanding on pro-poor initiatives within the framework of tuberculosis control programme in India and to identify mechanisms to improve the uptake and access to TB services among the poor.MethodologyA national level workshop was held with participation from all relevant stakeholder groups. This study conducted during the stakeholder workshop adopted participatory research methods. The data was elicited through consultative and collegiate processes. The research study also factored information from primary and secondary sources that included literature review examining poverty headcount ratios and below poverty line population in the country; and quasi-profiling assessments to identify poor, backward and tribal districts as defined by the TB programme in India.
Results:
Results revealed that current pro-poor initiatives in TB control included collaboration with private providers and engaging community to improve access among the poor to TB diagnostic and treatment services. The participants identified gaps in existing pro-poor strategies that related to implementation of advocacy, communication and social mobilisation; decentralisation of DOT; and incentives for the poor through the available schemes for public-private partnerships and provided key recommendations for action. Synergies between TB control programme and centrally sponsored social welfare schemes and state specific social welfare programmes aimed at benefitting the poor were unclear.
Conclusion:
Further in-depth analysis and systems/policy/operations research exploring pro-poor initiatives, in particular examining service delivery synergies between existing poverty alleviation schemes and TB control programme is essential. The understanding, reflection and knowledge of the key stakeholders during this participatory workshop provides recommendations for action, further planning and research on pro-poor TB centric interventions in the country.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Vishnu Kamineni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nevin Wilson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Anand Das</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Srinath Satyanarayana</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sarabjit Chadha</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kuldeep Singh Sachdeva</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lakbir Singh Chauhan</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-26T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-17</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-17-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-26T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/16">
        <title>Healthcare access and mammography screening in Michigan: a multilevel cross-sectional study
</title>
        <description>Background:
Breast cancer screening rates have increased over time in the United States. However actual screening rates appear to be lower among black women compared with white women.PurposeTo assess determinants of breast cancer screening among women in Michigan USA, focusing on individual and neighborhood socio-economic status and healthcare access.
Methods:
Data from 1163 women ages 50-74 years who participated in the 2008 Michigan Special Cancer Behavioral Risk Factor Survey were analyzed. County-level SES and healthcare access were obtained from the Area Resource File. Multilevel logistic regression models were fit using SAS Proc Glimmix to account for clustering of individual observations by county. Separate models were fit for each of the two outcomes of interest; mammography screening and clinical breast examination. For each outcome, two sequential models were fit; a model including individual level covariates and a model including county level covariates.
Results:
After adjusting for misclassification bias, overall cancer screening rates were lower than reported by survey respondents; black women had lower mammography screening rates but higher clinical breast examination rates than white women. However, after adjusting for other individual level variables, race was not a significant predictor of screening. Having health insurance or a usual healthcare provider were the most important predictors of cancer screening.DiscussionAccess to healthcare is important to ensuring appropriate cancer screening among women in Michigan.</description>
        <link>http://www.equityhealthj.com/content/11/1/16</link>
                <dc:creator>Tomi Akinyemiju</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Amr Soliman</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>May Yassine</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Mousumi Banerjee</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Kendra Schwartz</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Sofia Merajver</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>International Journal for Equity in Health 2012, null:16</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-21T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-16</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1475-9276-11-16-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>International Journal for Equity in Health</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1475-9276</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-21T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

