Table 2

Poisson estimation of relative risk per year and centre

ROME

1997

1998

1999

2000

Not overlapping 95% CI, 1997 vs 2000

Income index

RR

CI 95%

RR

CI 95%

RR

CI 95%

RR

CI 95%

Male

Q5

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Q4

1.14

1.12

1.16

1.12

1.10

1.14

1.13

1.11

1.15

1.10

1.08

1.12

*

Q3

1.23

1.21

1.25

1.21

1.19

1.23

1.20

1.18

1.22

1.19

1.17

1.21

*

Q2

1.31

1.29

1.33

1.31

1.29

1.33

1.28

1.26

1.30

1.26

1.24

1.28

*

Q1

1.53

1.50

1.55

1.50

1.48

1.52

1.51

1.48

1.53

1.47

1.45

1.49

*

Female

Q5

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Q4

1.14

1.12

1.15

1.12

1.11

1.14

1.13

1.11

1.15

1.10

1.08

1.12

*

Q3

1.22

1.20

1.24

1.20

1.18

1.21

1.19

1.17

1.20

1.15

1.14

1.17

*

Q2

1.33

1.31

1.35

1.29

1.27

1.31

1.29

1.27

1.31

1.27

1.26

1.29

*

Q1

1.51

1.49

1.53

1.48

1.46

1.50

1.47

1.45

1.49

1.45

1.43

1.47

*

BOLOGNA

1997

1998

1999

2000

Not overlapping 95% CI, 1997 vs 2000

Income index

RR

CI 95%

RR

CI 95%

RR

CI 95%

RR

CI 95%

Q5

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Q4

1.07

1.03

1.11

1.05

1.01

1.09

1.08

1.04

1.13

1.07

1.03

1.12

Q3

1.20

1.16

1.24

1.19

1.14

1.23

1.13

1.09

1.18

1.13

1.08

1.17

*

Q2

1.21

1.17

1.26

1.18

1.14

1.22

1.19

1.14

1.23

1.14

1.09

1.18

*

Q1

1.33

1.29

1.38

1.33

1.29

1.38

1.31

1.26

1.36

1.33

1.28

1.38

Female

Q5

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Q4

1.05

1.02

1.09

1.07

1.03

1.11

1.00

0.97

1.04

1.01

0.97

1.04

Q3

1.07

1.03

1.10

1.09

1.05

1.12

1.08

1.04

1.12

1.08

1.04

1.12

Q2

1.14

1.10

1.17

1.17

1.13

1.21

1.14

1.10

1.18

1.12

1.08

1.16

Q1

1.21

1.17

1.24

1.23

1.19

1.27

1.18

1.14

1.22

1.15

1.11

1.18

*

MILAN

1997

1998

1999

2000

Not overlapping 95% CI, 1997 vs 2000

Income index

RR

CI 95%

RR

CI 95%

RR

CI 95%

RR

CI 95%

Male

Q5

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Q4

1.09

1.07

1.12

1.09

1.06

1.11

1.10

1.08

1.13

1.10

1.07

1.13

Q3

1.13

1.10

1.16

1.14

1.12

1.17

1.14

1.11

1.16

1.10

1.07

1.13

Q2

1.25

1.23

1.28

1.23

1.20

1.26

1.25

1.22

1.28

1.20

1.17

1.23

*

Q1

1.42

1.39

1.46

1.43

1.40

1.46

1.49

1.46

1.52

1.40

1.37

1.44

Female

Q5

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Q4

1.06

1.04

1.09

1.04

1.02

1.06

1.07

1.05

1.10

1.01

0.99

1.04

*

Q3

1.11

1.09

1.14

1.13

1.10

1.15

1.13

1.11

1.16

1.05

1.03

1.07

*

Q2

1.19

1.17

1.22

1.18

1.15

1.20

1.21

1.18

1.23

1.12

1.09

1.14

*

Q1

1.31

1.29

1.34

1.29

1.27

1.32

1.31

1.28

1.34

1.20

1.18

1.23

*

TURIN

1997

1998

1999

2000

Not overlapping 95% CI, 1997 vs 2000

Income index

RR

CI 95%

RR

CI 95%

RR

CI 95%

RR

CI 95%

Male

Q5

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Q4

1.19

1.16

1.23

1.16

1.13

1.20

1.17

1.14

1.20

1.12

1.08

1.15

*

Q3

1.24

1.20

1.27

1.22

1.18

1.25

1.24

1.21

1.28

1.20

1.16

1.23

Q2

1.33

1.30

1.37

1.32

1.29

1.36

1.33

1.30

1.37

1.26

1.22

1.30

*

Q1

1.48

1.44

1.53

1.44

1.40

1.48

1.44

1.40

1.48

1.41

1.37

1.45

*

Female

Q5

1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00

Q4

1.22

1.19

1.25

1.17

1.14

1.20

1.17

1.14

1.20

1.15

1.12

1.19

*

Q3

1.29

1.26

1.32

1.24

1.21

1.28

1.26

1.23

1.30

1.28

1.25

1.32

Q2

1.37

1.33

1.40

1.32

1.29

1.35

1.31

1.28

1.34

1.30

1.27

1.34

*

Q1

1.48

1.44

1.52

1.44

1.40

1.47

1.38

1.34

1.41

1.41

1.38

1.45

*

§the model included income level, year, city, gender and age, and is fitted including the year*income*city interaction

Schifano et al. International Journal for Equity in Health 2009 8:33   doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-33

Open Data