Table 3 |
||||
|
Application of LQAS to assess whether health facilities are used by the poor adequately, Chakaria, June 2006 |
||||
|
Period of evaluation Day |
Threshold 40%–60%; Error = 16% Maximum number of non-poor (failure) permitted = 25 |
|||
|
|
||||
|
Upazila Health Complex |
Private clinic |
|||
|
|
||||
|
No. of non-Poor |
Judgment |
No. of non-Poor |
Judgment |
|
|
|
||||
|
1 |
17 |
Pro-poor |
42 |
Not pro-poor |
|
|
||||
|
2 |
13 |
Pro-poor |
42 |
Not pro-poor |
|
|
||||
|
3 |
14 |
Pro-poor |
45 |
Not pro-poor |
|
|
||||
|
4 |
13 |
Pro-poor |
44 |
Not pro-poor |
|
|
||||
|
5 |
13 |
Pro-poor |
43 |
Not pro-poor |
|
|
||||
|
6 |
21 |
Pro-poor |
41 |
Not pro-poor |
|
|
||||
|
Note: based on information from 50 randomly chosen attendees |
||||
|
Bhuiya et al. International Journal for Equity in Health 2009 8:29 doi:10.1186/1475-9276-8-29 |
||||
