Table 4 |
|
|
Criteria by which to judge priority setting efforts |
|
| (1) Public input and discussion |
solicit public input in order to inform health professionals and policy makers about
the beliefs, opinions, and preferences of the public. promote a public discussion
which aims to educate the public about the need for and options for setting priorities |
| (2) Appropriate principles |
establish a coherent, specific and action guiding set of publicly acceptable principles
on which to base priorities, including a practically useful and balanced method for
incorporating cost into the prioritization process |
| (3) Effect on policy and practice |
exhibit a sustained effect on the policy and practice of health care priority setting,
including through the establishment of an iterative process for review, evaluation,
and reconsideration of priority setting determinations |
|
|
|
|
Sabik and Lie International Journal for Equity in Health 2008 7:4 doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-4 |
|
