|
Processes for priority setting discussions |
||||
| Country |
Government officials included |
Health professionals included |
Public/lay representatives included |
Government commission |
|
|
||||
| Denmark |
NO |
YES |
YES |
YES |
| Israel |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES‡ |
| Netherlands |
NO |
YES |
NO |
YES |
| New Zealand |
NO |
YES |
NO† |
YES‡ |
| Norway |
YES |
YES |
YES* |
YES |
| Sweden |
NO§ |
YES |
YES§ |
YES |
| UK |
NO |
YES |
YES |
NO |
| Oregon (US) |
YES |
YES |
YES |
YES |
|
*patient representatives. † indirectly, through public meetings and surveys. ‡ regular review process. §included members of parliament | ||||
Sabik and Lie International Journal for Equity in Health 2008 7:4 doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-4 |
||||