Table 12 |
||
|
The impact of prescription drug charges on adherence to treatment |
||
|
Variable |
Compliance |
Study |
|
|
||
|
Co-payment |
- |
Atella et al. [76] (IT, NS, CD, R); Gibson et al. [191] (US, OS, CD, R); Poirier et al. [77] (CA, NS, TD, NR) |
|
Co-payment |
0 |
Poirier et al. [77] (CA, NS, TD, NR) |
|
Multi-tier formulary (vs. 1- or 2-tiers) |
- |
Landsman et al. [65] (US, NS, TD, R); Shrank et al. [79] (US, OS, CD, R); Taira et al. [80] (US, OS, CD, R) |
|
Co-insurance |
- |
Reuveni et al. [192] (IS, OS, CD, R) |
|
Mixed system |
- |
Ellis et al. [193] (US, OS, CD, R); Goldman et al. [194] (US, OS, CD, R); Mojtabai and Olfson [195] (US, OS, CD, R); Piette et al. [196] (US, OS, CD, R) |
|
Change from |
||
|
co-payment to deductible and co-insurance |
0 |
Pilote et al. [30] (CA, NS, CD, R) |
|
Has co-insurance (vs. has co-payment) |
- |
Dor and Encinosa [78] (US, OS, CD, R) |
|
Insurance coverage |
||
|
Primary (vs. none) |
+ |
Kennedy and Erb [197] (US, OS, CD, NR); Piette et al. [196] (US, OS, CD, R); Thomas et al. [144] (US, OS, CD, R) |
|
Primary public (vs. private) |
- |
Dodrill et al. [198] (US, OS, CD, NR) |
|
Supplementary (vs. none) |
+ |
Col et al. [199] (US, OS, CD, R); Safran et al. [200] (US, OS, CD, R); Schoen et al. [74] (US, NS, CD, NR); Steinman et al. [201] (US, OS, CD, R) |
|
Prescription limit |
- |
Cox et al. [35] (US, OS, CD, R); Schulz et al. [81] (US, NS, CD, NR) |
|
|
||
|
Country: CA = Canada; IS = Israel; IT = Italy; US = United States Type of study: ES = experimental study; NS = natural study; OS = observational study Type of data analyzed: CD = cross-sectional data; TD = time-series data; PD = panel data Type of statistical analysis used: R = regression techniques; NR = no regression techniques |
||
|
Gemmill et al. International Journal for Equity in Health 2008 7:12 doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-12 |
||