Table 3 |
|||||
|
Proposals in which the applicants expressed an intention to consider sex, subdivided into study type |
|||||
| Intention to consider sex differences |
Present |
Absent |
Number of proposals submitted |
||
| All |
Marked |
Little |
|||
| N (%) |
N (%) |
N (%) |
N (%) |
N (%) |
|
|
|
|||||
| Programme Prevention |
24 (23%) |
7 (7%) |
17 (16%) |
80 (77%) |
104 (100%) |
| Study type |
|||||
| basic |
3 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
7 |
| applied |
18 |
5 |
13 |
59 |
77 |
| implementation |
2 |
0 |
2 |
14 |
16 |
| classification unclear |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
| Programme Innovation |
11 (10%) |
3 (3%) |
8 (7%) |
98 (90%) |
109 (100%) |
| Study type |
|||||
| basic |
9 |
3 |
6 |
85 |
94 |
| applied |
1 |
0 |
1 |
10 |
11 |
| implementation |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| classification unclear |
1 |
0 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
|||||
|
Keuken et al. International Journal for Equity in Health 2007 6:13 doi:10.1186/1475-9276-6-13 |
|||||
